[The New] Form 990  (Starting 2008)
This page is going to be an evolving work in process.  
I will add to the page as I learn new things and develop new materials.  
There is a lot to learn.  As I write (5/09) my files are mostly at "version 2.0" and I will indicate version numbers in the
filenames.  
My best material is at the VERY BOTTOM of this page.  (Sorry, primitive software, so I can't do a
classic FAQ style drop down.)

Below are some downloadable teaching tools and some individual comments, and all the IRS forms downloadable in
filenames that make more sense than the way they appear on the IRS website.

I look forward to doing more presentations on the topic, so let me know if you're interested...it's more than just the
printed material :).  I'm also planning to experiment with some YouTube delivery.  Trainings can be tailored to
preparers (CPAs), to finance directors and executive directors, to clients of a public accounting firm, or all of the
above.  Let me know, maybe we can craft a particular session for you.

Some of the text below is outdated when it refers to "drafts" but the substance is still correct; I am unaware of any
substantive changes made between draft and final 2008 forms and instructions (May 09).
The [no longer quite so] "new" Form 990 and instructions are for Calendar 2008 and later.  

Process:  In June 2007, the IRS released draft forms and instructions and opened them up for
comments.  I submitted comments as did many others.  In December 2007, IRS released final
Forms (still marked "draft" but their stated intention is to fix only typos or errors).   They have all the
forms and instructions and more,
here.  They also have some basic background and positioning
pieces
here.  Below on this page I have these same files ready to download in larger Zip files, with
the internal forms named in full names (IRS uses short names like 990f.pdf or 990i.pdf).

Between drafts, they responded to over 650 commenters and removed, thereby de-emphasizing,
much of the first page "dashboard," particularly its reliance on functional percentages (program /
mgt&gen / fundraising), as well as another couple of ratios such as fundraising cost as a % of total
gift income.  They also moved program service revenue from the back of the form to Page 2.  They
dug in their heels on "governance" however, and this is probably the most important thing - see my
section below on this topic.

Implications:  My overall take on the form has moved up and down like my moods:  first I was
horrified, and then I "heard" what I thought my mentor Gary McGee, one of Portland's nonprofit CPA's
was saying, that in most respects the overhaul is just an attempt to formalize the information which
has always been required but was lost in the "(attach schedule)" in various questions and preparers'
failure to look up the instructions and respond completely.  Some of you will remember the advent of
Schedule B - for many years Form 990 Line 1d said "(attach schedule)" and the schedules were
missing or incomplete, so several years ago IRS promulgated Schedule B to force that preparation.  
That's still true, only now it's way up to more and more schedules.  HOWEVER, once I got to work
really  digesting the "final" drafts, I got concerned all over again.

My biggest concerns are two-fold:  1) the effect on smaller groups, and 2) predicted fall-off in public
transparency.  Small groups cannot afford a lot of high level advice, and aren't in the loop on changes
(although, those of you reading here:  get Chronicle of Philanthropy, and read it's page on "Managing"
- nothing too important will go on without you being notified there; also, go to irs.gov/charities, and
subscribe to the free EO-Update which comes infrequently enough to be a blessing and is very
skimmable before you decide whether to read deeper in one of the 1-3 topics they typically send out.

After the form was finalized they released draft instructions in March and accepted comments for a
couple months (everyone was exhausted and they got many fewer - neither AICPA or ABA commented
to my knowledge), and in August 2008 released final instructions, also marked "draft" but the same
stated intention to fix only typos or errors).

IRS Goal Fulfillment:  The IRS' stated goals were: increase compliance, increase transparency, and
no increase in burden.  The last goal has been subject of open derision.  I now have my doubts about
the second goal, depending on public’s willingness to read tax forms.  Unfortunately, we're in a kafka-
esque trap, right when the nonprofit economy falls apart along with the rest of them.  I hope this is not
a George Bush environmental thing come true, but Charles Grassley is no social justice liberal.  
Nonetheless, this is where we are now.
How did we get here?
Governance:
IRS "crown jewel"
Public Support Tests &
the Advance Ruling
Period:
Big changes!
Which Form to File?
990-N?
990-EZ?
990?
Relief:
990-EZ for more groups
Partial answers on
Hospitals & Bonds
The Overall Form &
Schedules
RAW Forms.  Nothing in this box has been marked or modified from what IRS publishes other than
their filenames which have been made longer and therefore easier to follow, plus the two zip files
hold a lot of separate files requiring maybe three dozen separate downloads from irs.gov.  These are
here as a convenience for my readers.
Here are Zip Files containing what they say they do, in one easy (big) download each, which will save
you time - on the IRS site there are many files since each Core Form Part has its own instructions,
and each Schedule and any continuation schedules are separate files:
All the forms:  
990 990EZ allSchedules FinalDrafts unmarked.zip
990 Core, 990 EZ, and all Schedules' specific instructions:  
990Core 990EZ allSchedules all Instructions unmarked.zip
In addition, the IRS has published at least three "general instructions."  One of them is very valuable
for having the "sequencing order" that is the best way to fill out the form (mostly:  'do financials first,
because so many other questions feed from them'), and also the GLOSSARY without which it is
impossible to function.  These forms are here:
990 General Instructions with Sequencing.pdf
990 Gen Glossary.pdf
990 Gen Appendix of Special Instructions.pdf
The 990-N

find and file at:
http://epostcard.form990.org
All 990 filers must now file SOMETHING every year; if they fail to for three years, they lose their
exemption.  Filers who are too small to file the 990 or 990EZ now must go online and file the "990-N
"e-postcard" which is very easy.  If you lose exemption, you must return to "start" and file for exemption
all over again.

This change is theoretically NOT part of the 990 revision, but came in through the Pension Protection
Act in 2006.  The idea was to clean up the list - if the IRS is carrying 750,000 exempt organizations
who don't file and are presumably under $25,000 they wanted to clean up the 25% or however many
were actually defunct.  Last I read, however, only about 10% had filed the 990-N and now the IRS
faces (in two years) the prospect of revoking 600,000 exemptions, and probably triggering 400,000
amateur re-applications so they hardly have the juice to read all of those and I expect to see the rule
changed.  

One last background...one good friend, Eve Borenstein (see my page on Resources: Lawyers for
more on Eve, who also is doing trainings on this new 990) calls the 990-N the "990-No"  :).

It's SIMPLE online, free, “e-postcard”.  All it asks for is:
Employer Identification Number (EIN or FEIN)
   also known as a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN))
Tax year you are filing for
Organization’s legal name and mailing address
   + any other names the organization uses
Name and address of a principal officer
   e.g. Chair or President
Web site address (if any)
Confirmation that gross receipts normally <=$25K
Whether going out of business
Form 990, unless small enough:
Form 990-N (simple online “e-postcard”)
2008, 2009:  Gross receipts “ordinarily” <$25K
2010 & beyond:  Gross receipts “ordinarily” <$50K
Form 990-EZ
2008:  Gross receipts <$1M and Assets <$2.5M
2009:  Gross receipts <$500K and Assets <$1.25M
2010 & beyond:  Gross receipts <$200K and Assets <$500K
By way of transition relief, IRS will allow smaller groups to file the 990-EZ for a couple years until the
full 990 hits them (like a "freight train on meth" in the words of one CPA who serves small nonprofits)
and Hospitals and Exempt Bond holders received some relief from 2008 reporting that I didn't fully
digest since I know too little to serve either of those.  As of 2009 I think it all kicks in just as Grassley
decides to go after exempt hospitals using old law (but that's a different story).
The 990 Structure
Key Parts of the 990 Core Form
I      Summary                                                (dashboard for the public)
III    Program Service Accomplishments (similar to old 990)
IV    Checklist of Required Schedules     (the so-called “trigger questions” - decoder below)
V     Other Filings & Tax Compliance       (you can’t “plead the 5th”)
VI    Governance, Mgt & Disclosure          (more below - an outline I am proud of!)
VII   Compensation                                      (unduly complex; more below)
VIII  Revenue                                                 (UBTI analysis on same page)
IX    Functional Expenses                           (very slight changes)
X     Balance Sheet                                       (virtually unchanged from old 990)

The 16 Schedules     (they made them somewhat alliterative;  
                                      these are my names and some guesses on the alliteration intended)
A       Public Support  / Public Charity basis                (990 & EZ)
B       Contributors                                                             (no change; 990 & EZ)
C       Campaign & Lobbying Activity                               (990 & EZ)
D       Supplemental Financial Statement Detail         (990 only)
E       Schools [Education] (no substantive change)   (990 & EZ)
F        Foreign Activities & Grants                                    (990 only)
G       Gaming (& Fundraising)                                        (990 & EZ)
H       Hospitals                                                                  (990 only)
I        Domestic Grants (Inside U.S.)                             (990 only)
J       Compensation (Justification?)                            (990 only)
K       Tax-Exempt Bonds ("K" is lawyer abbrev for contract)           (990 only)
L        Loans and Insider Transactions                         (990 & EZ)
M       Non-Cash Contributions                                       (990 only)
N        Termination / Disposition of Assets                   (990 & EZ)
O        Open for Narrative answers, both required & optional         (990 only)
R        Related Organizations                                           (990 only)
Biggest Changes
Compensation – Details AND Process
  • MORE Detail & Complex Calculations
  • Key Employee Compensation:  Process Detail
  • Good news for small groups is they will likely not hit many triggers

“Governance” (Governance, Management & Disclosure) – Wide Range of Questions
  • “Risk indicator” – private v. public benefit
  • Key decision:  if a policy is not legally required, should filer skip it and check “no,” or hurry up
    and get into compliance?

Other Important Areas of Change
  • Public Support Test
  • Political Campaign Activities
  • Financial Statement Schedules
  • Foreign Activities (Nine Regions)
  • Domestic Grants (Shorter List, more info)
  • Fundraising Events Detail
  • Loans and Insider Transactions
  • Non-cash Gifts, Valuation, Reporting
  • Related Organizations
No more Advance Ruling Period - No More Form 8734 - All Accrual Basis - 5 Year Measurement

Well, that about summarizes the changes.  Advance Ruling Period / 8734.  IRS will send you a new
letter if you are within your advance ruling period - now you just don't calculate % until Year SIX (Yrs
2-3-4-5-6) and then if it is under 33.3% for through Year FIVE (1-2-3-4-5) and if under 33.3% then test
through SIX with 10% plus facts & circumstances, and if not then test through FIVE with 10% plus
facts & circumstances, and if not then go file 990-PF you have just become a private foundation.  More
scary in some ways is the fact that the new Schedule A allows filers to change public charity status
among all nine choices by simply filling out the narrative schedule.  It's like giving razor blades to
small children I fear.  The 8734 is gone unless it's in process now.

5 Year Measurement Periods / Accrual Basis.  If you have been reporting cash basis as you were
supposed to you must now go back and recalculate the test on an accrual basis (imagine change in
present value discount for a future pledge :)...hey! I favored cash method and was about the only
one...now we'll see what happens).

One other change is it now clarifies which kinds of income that escapes UBI due to an exclusion
counts in the denominator besides interest and passive income (answer:  that income excluded as
not regularly carried on).  In my graffiti version, I mark the code sections to tie to the form's questions
and instructions.  I'm told this last one was always true but the form didn't precisely track the regs.
IRS has dug in its heels on governance.  Some have referred to it as their crown jewel.  They are not
governance experts and never have been.  Some of this produces really stupid results - example is
they want to know a lot about "endowments" but they include "quasi-endowments" which are just a
board-created category within unrestricted net assets - perhaps their goal is to get boards to stop
hoarding (as if!).  

Risk Indicator of Private Benefit.  The IRS primary concern is that narrow governance, lack of good
conflict policies and such might be indications that a charity is serving narrow private purposes rather
than public charitable ones.  I agree with them about this risk, but there is evidence that this is
slopping over, due possibly to lack of training, into exemption reviews & denials.  That is a true risk
and reminds one of the movie where they bused "pre-crime" thoughts.  Hence, on my governance
outline below, I footnoted that movie.

Two quotes.  First is IRS' Lois Lerner speaking to the National Association of State Charity Officials,
and the second is authority Bruce Hopkins commenting on a case denying exemption due to no
conflict policy and a narrow board (and other warning signs its only fair to acknowledge):

“Some folks would argue that we have gone beyond where we should be going” with such questions,
Lois G. Lerner, director of the Exempt Organizations Division of the IRS…
“We disagree; we think that governance is a very big part of accountability,” said Ms. Lerner. “There is
some argument that this is only the purview of the states. The IRS believes it is your purview but it is
also of interest to us.”…
“Ms. Lerner said governance policies are one factor that figure into “risk models” that the IRS uses to
help decide “which organizations we should use our scarce resources on” when selecting charities for
review.”
--  From “Governance Is Key Issue in Regulating Charities, IRS Official Tells State Leaders,”
Chronicle of Philanthropy, 10/16/07

“…organization was denied…tax-exempt status, in part because…it did not adopt a conflict-of-interest
policy and it lacks an independent board.
“…This attempt to invoke the private benefit doctrine is ludicrous. That doctrine is to be applied when
there is actual private benefit. It is not to be invoked on the basis of wild speculation, such as the
possibility that the organization’s assets “could” be used to benefit one or more board members.
“… It is imperative that this matter be advanced to the courts, where this arbitrary and capricious
policy can be stopped.”
-- Bruce Hopkins, in Nonprofit Counsel, October 2008 (Wiley Periodicals), commenting on PLR
200830028

News Flash:  as of Dec 09, IRS released a governance "check sheet" (checklist) and "guide sheet"
(instructions) for its field auditors to use in evaluating governance.  These include detailed questions
on Bylaws and you should study them if you advise nonprofits or have any questions about your
governance compliance.
OK.  Here are all the forms, marked up by me as "graffiti" with comments throughout when I find
something notable or strange or if the question needs annotation.  

Also here are special schedules I did:
   1.  a common language decoder of Core Form Part IV  "trigger questions,"
   2.  a special outline on "Governance" issues where I explain what IRS wants (form &
instructions), their legal authority (if any), what they say on background, my comments, and finally
my recommendations (this document continues to evolve)

These two above are particularly useful documents.

I have carried my "graffiti" comments to the final form and instructions for the Core Form
(Version 3.0) but the rest of it is still marked up final drafts (Version 2.0) which have not
substantively changed.   The only reason 2.0's are called "Temp" is because I need to get 3.0
done!

Forms:          
   990-2008-core-form-TMGraffiti-3.1.pdf  
   
990-EZ-and-Schedules-TMgraffiti-Temp2.0.pdf
                   
My "governance" outline:  
   Governance-on-Form-990-Policies-and-Actual-Procedures-4.0.pdf
     (see also discussion of IRS "check sheet" immediately above

Trigger Questions Decoder:  
   Trigger-Questions-Decoder-3.1.xls

IRS Glossary, marked up:  
   990-2008-IRS.Glossary-TMGraffiti-3.1.pdf

Instructions:
   990-2008-core-instr-TMGraffiti-3.1.pdf
   990-allSchedules-Instr-TMgraffiti-Temp2.0.pdf
   990-EZ-instructions-TMgraffiti-2.0-R.pdf
My "Graffiti" Forms
and Instructions
New Form 990 (for 2009) is out.  There have been some changes.
IRS has published a list of what it sees as key changes; some of them are important.  The forms and instructions are
all ready now on the IRS website.  I will work to update
this page in the next couple months.  Also remember that for
2009, the threshold for when you must file the full 990 (vs. the 990-EZ) drops to $500,000 (from $1M) in "gross
receipts" (and for 2010 will drop to $200,000, when the 990-EZ threshold will rise from "ordinarily" <$25K to ordinarily
<$50K).  There is also an Assets threshold for filing even if your gross receipts are low, but most of my readers don't
run any risk of triggering that one!  :-)